This, Mr. Chairman, is really not my amendment. What I've tried to do is articulate our concern with regard to the whole matter of defining the length of an academic year, based on instructional days. I'll give you one example. In the secondary school courses, there's a requirement; for instance, 25 hours per credit. You need 125 hours of instruction for a five-credit course, it's not 125 days. So you have to look at it in that context. That's an indication of the concern I had. We were trying to come back with an amendment to ensure that that occurred, and we would want to do it in 126.
The other point is that there's no guarantee that an instructional day will be four hours. So, in that sense, what we were trying to do is find a way to ensure that there were minimum hours set so that there was no confusion about it. Based on that, there was a suggestion to add more days or more hours; and we could do it very simply by addressing it through a quick amendment through the regulations. So that, Mr. Chairman, was my suggestion to the amendment that had been proposed by the committee. If we could agree to that, I would be proposing the appropriate amendment in 126, if I could get the approval of the committee. But you've introduced the motion already, and my recommendation would be not to agree to it as has been suggested.