Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I have a point of order. Mr. Speaker, I would like to raise a point of order concerning the comments made by the Premier in his Minister's statement on June 1, 1998 entitled, Statement of Conflict of Interest Commissioner's Decision, as this is my first opportunity after reviewing the unedited Hansard of June 1st. Mr. Speaker, my point of order is contained on page 2470 of the unedited Hansard. The words that concern me and give me cause to raise this point of order, Mr. Speaker, are, and I quote:
I, Mr. Speaker, look forward to the public inquiry proceeding as quickly as possible and I invite the Member from Hay River to make herself available as a witness at the inquiry and to submit herself to cross examination, under oath, from my solicitors. I am confident that the truth will be revealed to all those who wait.
The rules that I considered on which the Premier should be called to order are rules 23(h) and (j) which state that a Member will be called to order if the Member:
23(h) makes allegations against another Member, a House officer or a witness;
23(j) charges another Member with uttering a deliberate falsehood;
Mr. Speaker, the Premier has indicated that he now looks forward to the public inquiry to clear his name. His comments infer allegations that in bringing the conflict of interest complaint forward that I am lying and that under cross-examination, under oath, from his solicitors the truth will be revealed. Mr. Speaker, without getting into the substance of the complaint, I feel that I was only the means by which the complaint was brought forward and not necessarily a witness who would be required to justify the substance of the complaint. Mr. Speaker, the complaint was laid and is now in the hands of the Conflict of Interest Commissioner where the process of inquiry will take its course. I hope I will be called and even granted standing as a witness with respect to any information that I can provide.
Mr. Speaker, I do not wish to use the rules and House time on this issue, but I would submit that my point of order would have support under Beauchesne's Parliamentary Rules and Forms, 6th edition, and I quote from citation 487(1) and (2) under unparliamentary language:
"487(1) Threatening language is unparliamentary
487(2) Words may not be used hypothetically or conditionally, if they are plainly intended to convey a direct imputation..."
Mr. Speaker, one could conceivably interpret the honourable Member's invitation to submit to cross-examination by his solicitors under oath as an implied threat whereby he implied that under oath I would be forced to reveal information contrary to statements previous made, which implies that I previously lied and only under oath would the truth be revealed.
Mr. Speaker, I would request that you rule on this matter as to any infraction of parliamentary rules and practices that the Premier has infringed upon in his statement of June 1st. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.