Just a final question. I am just trying to get some clarity on this for myself and for the record. Is the clerk aware of any precedent from jurisdictions where it was silent on how it was ultimately interpreted?
Glen Abernethy on Committee Motion 87-18(3): Bill 20: Ombud Act - Deleting subclause 17(3) and substituting the following, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on October 31st, 2018. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 87-18(3): Bill 20: Ombud Act - Deleting subclause 17(3) and substituting the following, Carried
Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
October 31st, 2018
Page 4674
See context to find out what was said next.