(Translation) Mr. Chairman, I have a comment on page 14 as well, in support of the statement that was just made with regard to social assistance. It is the only source of income today in some places. The source of income that we receive, aside from social assistance, is from the harvesting of animal pelts which can help with the income, but these are very low in price now. The government is not responsible for the low prices, but those who are responsible for the low prices, are the animal rights groups. For that reason people require social assistance when they do not have any source of income. If you are not capable of being employed in the local economy, there should be something in place in order to have a source of income if there is no other way that we can make any money from animals. Not just from social assistance, but also in being able to improve the source of income that they have.
The income that we receive in the North -- we live in a cold climate -- although the resources are there, people are not buying our materials. When we were younger we did not receive social assistance, but we had to live off the land. Only when the retailers came up North and were buying the pelts were we able to buy other commodities from outside of our area and were able to pay for them. The commodities were not that expensive then, and we were able to afford them. We were able to buy them with pelts and the pelts were needed by others. But today it is very difficult for hunters because of lack of money. Because of the lower price of pelts, there should be something in place to subsidize the hunters. Thank you.