Yes, thank you, Mr. Chair. As has been mentioned in some of the comments that we have already heard, this was the bringing together of two pieces of legislation. Originally, the original plan Members will recall was to amend both acts, so, after hearing from respondents, we considered merging the two acts, so really this is a combination and an improvement of the two acts. I am also informed that IGCS specifically asked for minimal engagement on the bill, including no technical working group. The new act did not create any new authorities and dealt only with administrative and technical barriers to consistent land administration. I mean this is not a bill, an act, that is breaking new ground. There may be improvements in the future. I am sure I will hear about that. I listened seriously to the recommendations that committee brought forward. Yes, so this does represent an improvement on what we had before. Is it perfect? No, but we needed to move ahead with this.
As I say, at the beginning, we were going to amend both acts. I could not really understand why we could not put it all together in one, and we did hear through the engagement period, people did tell us, that we should consider, in fact suggested that we consider strongly, having this with one act, which is what we have done. Thank you, Mr. Chair.