Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’d like to thank the Member for raising this issue yet again here in a very clear way. As I indicated in the House, we are revising our Greenhouse Gas Strategy and we’re going to convert it to a climate change strategy. That document will be out in the next couple weeks as a discussion document. I can assure the Member that regardless of who’s in this House, in these chairs, the issue of climate change is going to continue to play a major role.
I would, as well, point out that in the last eight years, if you added the money we’ve spent on low water, not even counting the fires, but the money that we’ve invested into projects, into energy, into solar, into rebate programs, into biomass, we’d be well over $200 million. That is very, very serious investments. I agree that we have to have a long-term plan, but we cannot avoid, as well, the need to respond to things that we don’t control or we can’t really anticipate, like the magnitude of fire season, for example.
His motion is helpful. It brings attention to the issues. I just want to make the point, as well, that while we talk about it in this House, the Environment and Natural Resources, the government is at work on a climate change strategy. This motion binds or suggests that we somehow could bind the next Assembly through this motion. It will be there for advice and direction, of course, and when the incoming government is in place, they will look at all the work that’s been done as a government and determine what steps they’re going to take.
But I can assure the Member that his motion and the work he’s done in the last eight years have helped push this forward significantly.
As this is direction to Cabinet, Mr. Speaker, we will be abstaining from the motion.