Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I also see a need to have this compensation scheme dealt with by the end of this session. We have indicated to the public and to the public service that we will lead by example. I firmly believe that we have to provide a savings to this government that is equal to and most likely greater than that which we are asking our employees to provide.
Having said that, I would like to comment on an article in the Yellowknifer in which I was not necessarily misquoted but my words were taken a bit out of context. It was said in the article that I indicated that if people were only paid $71,000 a year, that they would not attend committee meetings. I think it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that if you're going to get $200 a day deducted for missing a committee meeting, you're going to attend committee meetings. It's obvious I didn't say that. What I did say was that there's no recognition for people who serve on two standing committees. All ordinary Members are required to sit on one standing committee; however, there are many people who serve on two committees and maybe some even on three committees. Having everybody paid at a rate of $71,000 a year does not recognize that fact. Anybody who
receives extra responsibility, whether you're a foreman, a director, a regional director or a Minister, gets paid extra when they get extra responsibilities. All I was indicating is that there should be no difference here.
The article also said that it was possible that MLAs wouldn't buy raffle tickets anymore. What I really indicated is that an MLA's job doesn't quit at 5:00 p.m. We have a huge invasion on our privacy and people expect us to be on call seven days a week, 24-hours a day, for 365 days a year. Every time somebody has some raffle tickets to sell, they come to us. If there's a bowl-a-thon, they come to us. If there's some kind of a function happening, it doesn't matter if it's at 10:00 p.m. at night or if it's on Saturday or Sunday, they ask us to come and speak or to be present at those functions. I feel that people do not understand an MLA's job; most people see us sit in the House for a couple of hours a day for two or three weeks in a month but that is not all we do and that is basically the easiest thing that we do. The main part of the job is answering constituents' questions and trying to help them out to solve their problems that they come to us with. I know from MLAs that have retired, whether of their own volition or otherwise, that MLAs make enemies and that it is very difficult to be employed once you leave here.
For those reasons and many others, I believe that MLAs should be compensated adequately. At the same time, I believe that the current pension scheme is too lucrative and that it has to be changed. I also believe, and I stated this to the commission when I made my presentation to them, that the compensation scheme has to be made more simple and that there should be some way that we receive the same amount every two weeks just like any other employee of the territorial government. That way you know what you're going to get and you know how much to spend, how to get loans so that you can make your payments and the rest of that. The way it is now, you never know how much you're getting from one week to the next or from one month to the next. Thank you.