Thank you, Mr. Chairman. When I was the chairperson of the Ordinary Members' Caucus with Mr. Dent, during the review or the evaluation, as we called it, I was the one who read the evaluation or review in the House to the Speaker and I had a very bad experience. Some of the Ministers were getting graded; some as B and it was coming to the point where some were graded F. I don't think I want to go through that again, Mr. Chairman. I guess if we want to do a review we should forget about the grading. Some of the Ministers, I guess one or two, were given six months to shape up or ship out. I don't think we should look at it in that context. I think it should be a more friendly manner than we did last time.

So I agree basically, but we want to behave like we want to work together. During the past few days each and every Member stated in our orientation workshop that we wanted to work together, even the new MLAs stated in another forum that we were in that the public perception is that MLAs during the 12th Assembly were always fighting in the House, there was bickering and so on. I think the public wants to see a friendlier, people-working-together environment within the government.

There were two or three MLAs from this forum who stated we have been, during the past years, using our energy fighting among each other. We should be using the energy to work for the benefit of the people. In that respect, Mr. Chairman, I support the mid-term review 100 per cent, but I don't want to go to the grading system whereby some Ministers were getting an F, perhaps one or two, I'm not going to name names. I think we should do it in a friendlier manner. Thank you.