Thank you, Mr. Chair. Cabinet solidarity is an issue, but it is necessary in some cases because we can't have anarchy and we need to be working together as a government, but I do think that we need to look at a three-tier system, actually, a system that looks at low risk. For example, things like picking out Cabinet Ministers if they are out for evaluation. Is that a risk to the government as a whole? If not, then we should be opening that vote for Cabinet Minister to have a free vote. We need to look at medium risk. If there is a risk and we are not sure, then I think Cabinet as a whole needs to define, not just the Premier and say, "Can we stand on our own or do we need to vote in solidarity?"

At the highest risk, if there is integrity, if it jeopardizes the integrity of this system, of this institution, at that point I do believe that Cabinet solidarity has to be in place, but I do think that, instead of it being ad hoc and decided at the moment, which I experienced, we need to decide that as soon as we sit as Cabinet Members and decide at what point we would be looking at solidarity and when we can't. Because I do think that there were a lot of times that open vote would have been appropriate, and it was hard to not have that option. Thank you, Mr. Chair.