Thank you, Mr. Chair, colleagues. I'd like to start by introducing myself more personally to those who may not know me very well yet. I am very grateful to have been welcomed as a newcomer to Chief Drygeese territory, home of the Yellowknives Dene First Nation, and lands now shared with other Dene, Metis, and Inuit peoples. Some of you may know my story already, as I have told it many times, but for those who do not, my parents, Ed and Bev, adopted me at 14 days old in Calgary. That's where I was born. Both of their parents immigrated from eastern Europe in order to try and provide their families with a better future. My parents did not have the opportunity to go to university, but they worked very hard to make sure that I would. I graduated from the University of Calgary first and then a law degree from the University of Toronto thereafter.
I met my birth parents in my early 20s. My birth mother Shelly is from central northern Alberta as is my birth father Steven. And one of the first things that his family sent me after we connected was our family tree, showing and explaining to me their membership in the Metis Nation of Alberta tracing our ancestral roots to the Red River Nation and ultimately an uncle many times once removed of Mr. Louis Riel.
My grandmother has asked me whether I've completed yet the paperwork that they sent me, more than once, for myself and my children to join as members. Being not a resident of Alberta, I cannot join the Metis Nation of Alberta and without a land connection in the Northwest Territories, I cannot join the Metis nation here.
Different people have different adoption experiences. I do want to be clear. I don't identify as Indigenous. I am deeply proud of my ancestry and my family's history, and I have openly told my story for a long time but I was not raised in a Metis culture and particularly given the public role that I've occupied for some time, I'm sensitive to not take space from those who have direct connections to an Indigenous language, culture, or lived experience.
I am deeply grateful to live in a place where my children have the opportunity to experience Indigenous cultures alive around them every day.
I want to speak a bit this morning to why I'm running, what I think I can bring to this position, and end with some comments about consensus government. And on that, I'll start where I left off on Monday, which is about vision.
In my observation, the Government of the Northwest Territories struggles to articulate vision. It is frustrating to residents. It is frustrating to the public service. It is frustrating to prospective investors. Who are we and what do we want to do?
Individual departments certainly produce action plans and strategies, we put forward our list of priorities, but historically it's difficult to bring this down to a cohesive vision. And one of the reasons I've decided to put my name forward as Premier is because I want us to help articulate a vision. And to be clear, it is not my vision.
Any vision for the Government of the Northwest Territories should not be the vision of the Premier's office. It must be the vision of the government. It must flow from this Assembly. But there are some functional responsibilities in the office. One is that the Premier, in my view, is responsible to put forward a sense of vision of who we are to the rest of Canada and on the world stage.
Now, just as the horizon is always changing, in my view our vision towards that future horizon should also be capable of change but we do need to at least be looking at the horizon. And so to pick up where I started on Monday, I would suggest the Northwest Territories is a trailblazer in Indigenous reconciliation and consensus-style government. We should be known as a place of opportunity, a place of history, of culture, of somewhere that is ready to innovate, and we have healthy people, educated people, who are ready to maximize on all of these opportunities.
And so why am I running?
Besides wanting to see more vision, I also would like to see our political vision more easily and more frequently translated into government action. The reputation of an inability to translate government into practical and timely change must end. The Assembly voices our political priorities, and the Premier's office ought to be translating and driving that vision into the government alongside every Ministers' office into their departments. So why do we struggle to sometimes get things done?
Vision is one part of it. There's also information sharing. We can do a much better job of sharing information with Indigenous governments, with the committee MLAs, with the public. That will help build trust in our processes. We need not be afraid of sharing information even in a 24-hour news cycle. It doesn't give a lot of room for error. But in my experience if you make a mistake and you own it, people will look past it.
Our regional authorities need more accountability to make decisions. We talked about this in the last Assembly, but it is a lot more challenging than it sounds. We hear the criticism that the bureaucracy is running everything. So then how much authority do you give to a bureaucrat to make a decision in the face of that criticism?
Again, I do think it is possible to find a balance. I think, quite practically, you create matrices so that there's an understanding and when there's conflicts that exist in the decision-making process, you create guidelines so it's clear what the parameters of the decision are; you set timelines and make sure they're public so that people know within what kind of timeframe your decision-makers are supposed to be making their decisions; and you allow for appeal mechanisms so that when something does go wrong it can go back up the chain.
Importantly, though, translating political ideas into operational realities does take leadership. I want to give you a couple of examples.
When I started four years ago, incremental budgeting approach was not intuitive to me. Why do we assume every year that one department should get the same funding as they had every year before? Is that the best amount of funding? Is it working? Are they delivering what they need to deliver? Evidence-based decision-making was still a bit of a buzzword at the time. I think it's one we should bring back.
Cutting things out for the sake of cutting is pointless. It's been tried. Sometimes people just didn't cut it and then you'd forget about it, or other times they'd cut something easy like policy functions or communications functions rather than a frontline service only to have that catch up with you later. And so out of my questions about efficiencies and where can we actually be better spending all of our budget came the government renewal process. It was a problem that I identified. Public service came up with a solution. It came up to Cabinet for much discussion but it's been instituted.
Imagine that four years ago the Government of the Northwest Territories did not know all the programs and services it offered. I find that quite striking. But we do now.
Imagine that four years ago we did not have a program evaluation policy. This is not the kind of sexy announceable that one goes and takes a picture with, but I find it to be quite fundamental to the functioning of good government.
So the vision I was acting on was one of efficiency. I asked why things were the way they were, and the public services produced me a response, and believe me I do certainly tweak the decision papers before I sign them, but the idea was that we were able to take a political will and turn it into action.
I had much the same experience with the capital budget. Why do we allow ballooning budgets when we know that our capacity rests so much lower? Well, again, now we cap it. We have slower debt growth. We have room under the borrowing limit. Quite frankly, it came not a moment too soon given what happened with the wildfire season.
And so what type of qualities do I suggest that I might bring? If you want to get to know me and my style, what I believe in and my values as a professional, then I would suggest that you read the objectives for change that are in the Government of the Northwest Territories' action plan in response to the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls titled Changing the Relationship. If you want to go further back, you could read the submissions that I made on behalf of the Native Women's Association of the Northwest Territories to the national inquiry. They are strikingly similar.
These values are that you acknowledge. You face a problem at hand honestly.
Second, you establish, build, and foster trust. Trust takes time. It takes communication, humility, and it takes a sense of demonstrating that when you say you're going to do something, you do your very best to do it. And if you can't, you explain why.
Be person centered. As an elected public servant, never forget who you serve.
And last, accountability. That you monitor and evaluate ongoing efforts to affect change. Change is not easy, a path may not be obvious, but it will come from being methodical in your approach, diligent in your monitoring. Pay attention, follow up, find the barriers to success and break them down.
Again, that sounds easy. It's not. But I want to give a few examples where we have seen some success and some movement.
In terms of acknowledging, I have acknowledged that the public service was not representative of the population that it serves.
Imagine this: Four years ago there was no strategic human resources plan. There was no meaningful succession planning. There was no Indigenous recruitment and retention framework. No means of reviewing the JDs, the job evaluations that so many of us complain about. No training or education plans and no incentivization at senior leadership for performance indicators to make sure that we are actually employing all these tools now. It's going to take a culture shift to achieve all of these things but it started from the acknowledgement, and a true acknowledgement of the problem.
One crisis I would like to acknowledge, and I think we are all going to have to face in the next four years, I want to acknowledge the addictions crisis that is gripping our communities. We have been hearing about it all week. Many of us have been hearing about it through the campaign. We need to acknowledge it. It needs to start from the top.
On building trust, as I said trust does take time. It takes dialogue. It takes relationships. A few small examples, because sometimes they start small, I did start the budget dialogue process as a way in order to engage with outside of government, not only about what we're doing but about the things that people say we are not doing. It's often a difficult conversation. But some good things did grow from it, such as having forced growth for contribution agreements, which is an idea that certainly grew from there and from the conversations that I had.
Having town hall meetings with public servants. Again, it seems simple. But it was incredible what an important direct connection it gave to myself and deputies to have back to our frontline staff.
I think we can do more here.
- I think we can have better culture change in the public service.
- Perhaps a whistleblower style process for excluded employees, because right now they don't have one.
- A clear series of outcomes when there's been a finding of misconduct in the workplace, because right now it's not clear what happens next.
- Clear travel plans and expectations so that Ministers and deputies are in every community.
- Regional directors in every community who report in not only to deputies but also to Ministers who need to hear what's happening in every region.
And we are seriously in need of trust in our relationships with Indigenous governments. Of course we should be going to Ottawa together. This seems obvious to me, and it seems simple, but it is not happening.
I am proud of some of the progress we've made in the last four years: Council of Leaders, the Intergovernmental Legislative Protocol, and the implementation of the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous people. But it is time to move forward with that foundation and be true partners. This will achieve more for every person, every resident, and every community in the Northwest Territories.
And the last of the values I wanted to speak to was accountability. We need stronger single point accountability for whole-of-government solutions. That rests, in my view, in the Premier's office.
There are simple things that I think can make a difference to ensure better accountability for deliverables. I have been thinking about how the longer timeframe that we're proposing for our priorities might impact on mandate letters, and it occurred to me that perhaps this is an opportunity for mandate letters not to stagnate. Perhaps the mandate letters should be more like our business plans, where every Ministers' office becomes accountable year over year throughout the process. Our key fundamentals don't change but it means that as things are accomplished, we can add to it and they could be more flexible. And we should be meeting on them regularly. Deputies, Ministers, Premier's office, should be all meeting on them regularly so that we are all working together, never just for the sake of meetings. Believe me, we don't need more of them. But if there is a barrier to achieving something, we must identify it early.
Often the barrier is outside of one's department, it may be at another level of government, and therein can be a role for the Premier's office to help break that down.
A small wish list item for me, I would like to take the red tape working group into the Premier's office. I was quite pleased to receive the Golden Scissors Award for creating the red tape working group. But, and it's a big "but", there's a lot more that could come from this.
There's been a number of things brought forward and identified but not all of the barriers have been broken down. Indeed, it strikes me when I have read in the reports essentially the words of well, Minister, it's hard to change these things. It infuriates MLAs. It infuriates the public. Public servants don't want to have to give that answer. We must find a way to break those barriers down.
I saw that, too, when I initially was responsible for the ICM -- the delivery of ICM here in the Government of the Northwest Territories, where, again, we would find the barriers between different departments but be unable to change the processes. Somewhere, eventually, in government that authority must rest and surely it would rest in the Premier's office.
An example of why this is important to the whole-of-government problems that we still see is within procurement. When we instituted the procurement review from the last government, there were multiple departments involved - infrastructure, ITI, housing, finance. I was struck by the fact that there was multiple different versions of objectives and principles for procurement existing across government. Imagine. And how are we supposed to actually act as a unit?
And after the independent review and a working group of all of the departments, each one wanting to make change, it was clear that each was waiting on the other to do something and yet nothing was getting done. Months were passing, and there was no response.
I did bring them together having made it clear, and having had it made clear, rather, that I would be the lead. I brought all the departments together with senior levels and the public servants were more than eager to have a sense of clear direction. With clear direction and a work plan and a timeline, we settled on principles, produced a response, and have instituted significant change. We are now actually monitoring the promises that are made for northern contracting.
Accountability also means being present. I have not talked about specific priorities for this Assembly. I believe the priorities are a matter of collective discussion, and we are only partway through that process. But there is one exception. The Premier's office is the lead for executive and Indigenous affairs which is, in turn, the lead for land and self-government negotiations. In my view, there must be political leadership engaged in land and self-government negotiations and in the implementation of the existing agreements. I have a healthy appreciation for the distinction between the politics and governance and operations, but negotiations have political elements to them and negotiation mandates need to be responsive and reflective of political priorities. It is very clear that every Indigenous government is unique, the kind of political arrangements and agreements they are seeking are unique, and there are three parties at these tables. But one thing I do not want to see at the end of our four years is for the Government of the Northwest Territories to ever be described as the barrier holding up any agreement.
I will close with some comments on consensus government.
Before moving forward with my intention to put my name forward for Premier, I have made an effort to get to know each of you and to contact some of the Indigenous government leaders who I have had the chance to come to know over the last four years. My goal was to be aware whether or not another Yellowknife-based Premier would cause too great a rift. Had that been so, I would not have put my name forward.
I am conscious of the rift that exists already between Yellowknife and small communities. I certainly don't want it to get worse. I hope that we can find a way to move forward and make it better. Because politics in the Northwest Territories is founded on consensus and that, in turn, requires relationships, discussion, trust, and respect.
One of the things that has been one of my single biggest challenges, and the thing I am the most proud of, in the last four years, is that I was responsible for negotiating all eight budgets of the 19th Assembly for operational and for capital. And I am proud to say that with the support of my colleagues on Cabinet, we did not have to go out and seek out the three friends' approach. I did much work to find pathways for individual Members to see some of their priorities and wishes reflected in the budgets during the course of negotiations. That sometimes came through increases to programs or funds that would then be relevant to what they were looking for, such as the Indigenous patient advocates. And at other times, I worked with my colleagues who could then, from their own departments, go and speak with the other Members and try to find ways to work with those departments directly on the projects that mattered to them. It did not mean that we had to pick items from a wish list. We found a way to amend our proposed estimates in a way that reflected our shared priorities as an Assembly.
There was a lot of back-and-forth discussions. There was some very long and tense discussions. People did not always leave happy from those discussions. But there was an interesting evolution of the process from the very first time we started back in 2020 to the last capital budget of 2024-2025.
I found that at the beginning there was a very formal sort of letter negotiation and letter exchange that took place. The correspondence had to flow entirely through the clerk's office, and there was little direct discussion. However, by the end I found that I appeared more and more frequently in front of committee. It became expected that I would appear, in fact, in front of committee and that we would engage in a dialogue as a group.
All of us on Cabinet became comfortable with this. There was never any question as to whether we would be needing three because we knew that the process, although more fraught and more lengthy, would yield fruit. And it did. And I am very honoured for the work we did.
Colleagues, we have a lot of bench strength in this room. I am very honoured to have the opportunity to serve with all of you. I am sincerely pleased, and I hope that if I am back in Cabinet, that I will -- in whatever capacity, that I will have the opportunity to rely on you as committee MLAs. Because quite simply, we cannot get the work in the GNWT done without strong leaders amongst MLAs. I saw that firsthand. Budgets would not have passed through the consensus government process I just described without leadership amongst MLAs, particularly the chair and deputy chair of the OC.
I do hope I have the opportunity to support my colleagues as Ministers in a Cabinet. It would be our Cabinet. It would not be my Cabinet. I promise I would not forget that. Cabinet and the Premiership still belongs to this Assembly. I would hope that we can all show the public as leaders that we can focus on our priorities, unite in our effort as government, and do so in a way that respects all of our collective responsibilities to rebuild trust in this institution and create momentum towards positive change. Thank you.