Just on the process here. It seems to me that there was some general agreement that in the new planning process and in sort of delaying the budget, it was to give Members a more equal opportunity to feed into the development of a capital plan. As a cabinet the direction is given to us. It seems to me that there is a question as to the reason this is put on the floor. For some reason the honourable Member does not feel that the SCOF process is going to work for him, so he feels he wants to circumvent that process in dealing with his issue. And the reason he is putting the motion on the floor is, he wants to aim to the two year review to see whether his project is going to be considered and then he will make a determination.

But then again, is that also saying that every other Member should be putting all their motions for all their capital projects on the floor as well, and circumvent all the process that comes around in terms of the communities, the planning and the assessments that are done in terms of regional need. It seems to me it is placing an unfair advantage on the other people who are going to use the process for determining where their capital requirements are. In any event, it is an observation.