Mr. Chairman, I realize, that perhaps there are contaminants in the environment, but what I was trying to get at, Mr. Chairman, is monitoring. A monitoring system on the health conditions of people in the north, in designated areas. You monitor it so that you will know a level, if development happens, and there are changes happening, then you could very well say that for the last 20 years it was at this level, and as soon as they put this mine in, it started to going up, cancer started going up, or liver sickness. Things started happening, then you could prove, in the event of a court challenge, that it was as a result of the mine, because before that, these were the conditions of the people, and there is a consistent trend. When developments happened, the trend changed. That is what I am trying to get at. I certainly agree that before anything, any development happens, that the health of the people and the environment should be considered.

What I am suggesting is that we do not have any monitoring programs, which could be done by the nurse maybe to take water samples, or tear samples, or blood samples, so that you are always monitoring on a yearly basis the health conditions of the people. Every year, it does not matter whether the development is 50 years away, the monitoring should start now. So that in the event that development does happen, this government or the communities can say that these are the conditions before you came for the last 50 years, and it has changed all of a sudden because of your pollution, or whatever the case may be. That is all I am trying to get at.