This is my last comment. If that is the case, I hope this is documented in some kind of policy so that you have criteria when requests come in. It seems as if you penalize a group or community for being effective and efficient in raising money, and they are, then, not eligible to receive some of these dollars that should be available to them on top of money they do raise. I assume you have a rating sheet that says that this project or this centre is requesting a certain amount of money, and that "Yes, it is a priority,* and "Yes, they need it, and in year one or two they will get a piece of it."
Fred Koe on Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
In the Legislative Assembly on March 11th, 1992. See this statement in context.
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
March 10th, 1992
Page 370
Fred Koe Inuvik
See context to find out what was said next.