I have some difficulty accepting this explanation as to exactly what we are building. If that is the case, then for about six years we are going to be living in digs or just will not do the job. In other words, if division does not take place until the year 2000 or around about that time, then in five or six years we will be in bad shape. This is the message I am getting from what the Minister has just indicated.

It is my understanding that when we decided to build this thing, we were building something that was going to be there for 100 years. If division takes place, we would not have to worry about expansion if it is already there. We may be underoccupying it for a while, but over a hundred-year period it is going to be okay. The message I got when we discussed this is completely different from the one I have just heard. I am wondering if this is documented anywhere, because I have certainly watched the progress toward getting our own Legislative Assembly for a long, long time now. I have followed every little step. I am wondering if there is any written documentation that I could refer to, because I am very interested in the whole project and how it started and developed, et cetera. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.