Mr. Chairman, I do not quite understand what the government is saying, because they knew in November, before this supp 3 document was put together, that FMB, Financial Management Board, approved to delay this project. That is what the Minister of Renewable Resources indicated to us in this House in early November when they assessed all capital projects, when we knew we were having financial problems. That is four or five months. They had ample time to put it in as a negative supp. Or did they put this supp together -- only the capital projects that are going to be forwarded in 1992-93, are those the only projects they included in this supp? Because if you look at all capital projects, all the negative supps coming in, there is always a note that says these projects have been included in the department's 1992-93 capital estimates. What about the ones that we know have not gone ahead, which were approved by FMB to be delayed? Where do they show up?
Henry Zoe on Bill 25, Supplementary Appropriation Act, No. 3, 1991-92
In the Legislative Assembly on March 30th, 1992. See this statement in context.
Bill 25, Supplementary Appropriation Act, No. 3, 1991-92
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
March 30th, 1992
Page 530
See context to find out what was said next.