Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I remember that review because I was here as an ordinary Member at that time. That review was not accepted at that time by the Assembly, I believe. The thing is that it is done, and it is going to go to cabinet. We cannot look at it only as a rental review of the public housing. We are going to have these other programs developed. For instance, my understanding is that one portion of the review is that the higher your income the more rent you will pay. There is a certain level where you start paying more rent, and the justification of that was to encourage people with a higher income to get out of social housing and get into their own homes. But if we do not have programs developed where they can get into their own homes, then it is not a very good thing to do.

I believe you have to have the programs developed so that we can get people into their own homes. Home-ownership is the priority of this Housing Corporation; the home-ownership program is supposed to be the top priority. We have to encourage people to get into their own homes. Right now, the higher income -- for example, if you give them a HAP house, even under the existing program, that is about $100,000. If you leave them in public housing you end up subsidizing them to the tune of about $800,000, because of the cost of that unit. So it is better to get them into home-ownership. But it should be done at the same time as the rest.