Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I will make my comments brief, I have expressed many of my concerns to the Minister in the Standing Committee on Finance meetings.
However, I do want to indicate to the Minister, that I am still disappointed with the fact that the Department of Education is considering the elimination of the Northern Leaders Program.
I recognize that the Minister had wanted to justify the cost of running the program, and possibly redirect the funding into the Student Assistance Financial Program. I do not agree with that particular point. I want to point out a couple of items. The purpose of setting up the Northern Leaders Program initially, was to try to encourage leaders, that are currently within the claims process, to go out, get educated, to be able to come back into the north, and implement their claims as they were successful, concluded and negotiated.
It appears that since this government, and this past government, had made that effort to set up the program, I do not know what measures, or what types of success measures, was put in place to determine whether they are successful or not. The concept was greatly supported by many people. I do not know if the program was being delivered in an equitable manner to ensure that this was the purpose of the program, and that the concept was being adhered to.
It is somewhat disappointing, as a native person, to recognize that the past government, and now this government, set up a program specifically for native people to go and get educated, but for many years since this government's creation, we have had programs through educational leave where we allowed for many non-natives, and many senior bureaucrats in this government, to acquire a masters degree, or some type of a degree, after being recruited by the Government of the Northwest Territories. They have had that opportunity to further their education at government expense.
Now, it appears that as soon as we develop a leadership program to address conclusions and negotiations of upcoming claims that we are going to be looking at, we decide to cut the Northern Leaders Program. I would like to point that out to the Minister that, not only myself, but other Members that feel that this program, even though it had its shortfalls, should be looked at once again to determine if this program could be a successful one. If it is able to address the political needs, and able to address the proposals of self-government that we are talking about, the constitutional talks, and native people talking, and trying to address their own destiny in the territories. So, I would like to ask the Minister if his department would reconsider, and possibly revamp the program, so that they may want to look at placing it back in place to give native leaders, or native people the opportunity that this particular program maybe available in the future?
The other comment that I have, Mr. Chairman, is in respect to the Apprenticeship Program. I am concerned with the fact that, even though I know we have a fairly good success rate of apprenticeships, there may still be a good percentage of apprentices that do not conclude their apprenticeship in the prescribed time frame that is allotted. There may be an abuse of the program. That an individual may not be concluding their apprenticeship in the time period that is set up for them, and I wonder what the department has done, and what measures do they take, to ensure that these individuals, once they go for a four year apprenticeship, are not taking eight years to complete it? Is the Department of Education monitoring, so that they do conclude their Apprenticeship Program within the four years that is prescribed? I believe there are some apprentices that have taken an excessive amount of time.
In respect to, Mr. Chairman, two other comments on the quality of education, the concern of many Members is on the standardization of education. We have to find some method to be able to standardize it, and, I believe, we also have to find some way to maintain educational standards among the teachers that deliver that education. I would like to know if the department would look at a concept of trying to find a system in place to do periodic testing, to ensure the teachers, that are delivering the education, do maintain an educational standard? I believe it is in Alaska, I cannot recall which jurisdiction, but they have testing, every five years, that ensures whether or not the teacher is still fully qualified to be able to teach. It prevents a teacher from allowing themselves to become stagnant, and also encourages a teacher to look at new ideas. So, in order to ensure that we are striving toward a quality education, I strongly believe that standardization of the education program is critically important. We also have to ensure that the teachers that deliver the program, the educators, are maintaining an educational standard that is acceptable. Thank you.