Mr. Speaker, the work plan is in a very rough draft form, which, I think, is what the Member has in her hands. All of the Members of the political committee are going to voice their views on the context, the content, and the outline, of that paper as it is written. Following that, if there is sufficient reason to believe most of the Members are in line with it, then it will go to, I think, a committee meeting, and it would be discussed. I think if the Member wants, I can table a final draft that is going to go to the next meeting of political leaders for discussion, as a way to get input from the Members, then that is what we can do.

The fact is, right now, this Legislature is the one that has the dollars to continue the process, or to shut it down, because the submission is going to be made to this Legislature. I think, if the Member wants input at this stage, and she wants to do it here in the Legislature, then that is fine.

It is rather awkward because, as I say, the last submission that was made by this group was made directly to this Legislature, and it was abruptly approved with dispatch, as somebody said last week. I am not certain that this is the process for it, but I have no difficulty with the suggestion, and I would be prepared to do it. I just do not want to get into a debate with Members about what the process should be.

We are trying to go with the flow, and I think give them whatever comfort we can, to let them make suggestions on how the work should be done on the next phase, or how they think phase two of the constitutional development of the territories should proceed, the western territories. Let us say, that it is not Members of the eastern Arctic who are going to watch, with some interest, because it will not directly affect them, but they know that people will come cap in hand to this Legislature for the money. Thank you.