My question concerns the judicial system when we refer to zero tolerance towards violence. I know that when an offense is committed, normally police officers have probable grounds to arrest that person. If we were to adopt such a policy, does that compel the RCMP to not tolerate any violence? If violence is reported, then there are no questions asked? They arrest the person, investigate and if the report is frivolous -- regardless of whether the person did anything -- they are locked up in jail because of that policy being adopted. I would go further by asking whether the policy would have an impact on judgments being made by judges? That was my concern.