This is page numbers 279 - 312 of the Hansard for the 12th Assembly, 4th Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was chairman.

Topics

Committee Motion 40-12(4): To Delete Rankin Inlet From Keewatin Region, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 307

The Chair

The Chair Tony Whitford

Does the committee agree?

Committee Motion 40-12(4): To Delete Rankin Inlet From Keewatin Region, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 307

Some Hon. Members

Agreed.

---Agreed

Department Of Education, Culture And Employment Programs

Committee Motion 40-12(4): To Delete Rankin Inlet From Keewatin Region, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 307

The Chair

The Chair Tony Whitford

Thank you. Please turn to 16-7. Is the Minister prepared to make his opening remarks? Mr. Nerysoo.

Introductory Remarks

Committee Motion 40-12(4): To Delete Rankin Inlet From Keewatin Region, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 307

Richard Nerysoo Mackenzie Delta

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Yes, I'm prepared, but 'm not quite sure how long Members want to sit and listen to the opening remarks.

Mr. Chairman, committee Members, many of the introductory budget remarks made in previous years have noted the impact of change. Dramatic changes are occurring in the territorial financial, economic and political environment which have an impact on the level of service government can provide and cause us to explore different and better ways of providing programs.

Growing financial restraint across the government is limiting capital resources, but the demand for program services continues to increase. In 1991-92, the capital budget for education was $31.2 million; in 1992-93, the budget was $26.6 million and in 1993-94 the budget for Education and Employment is $32.3 million, including about $3 million in capital for culture and heritage.

Government of the Northwest Territories' facilities contributing to Education and Culture and Employment programs are valued at about $450 million. Simply to keep up with the replacement needs of these assets, on a 20 year cycle, we would need about $20 million a year. Mr. Chairman, as the Standing Committee on Finance recommended last year, we need to make a concerted effort to improve our capital management and planning program, including planning based on demographics.

The demand for education, culture and employment programs is largely driven by increases in the populations using these programs. The school age population is growing at about four per cent a year and the birth rate in the territories is the highest in the country. The number of students enrolled in senior secondary grades has increased by 70 per cent from 1988-89 to 1992-93, from 1,397 students to 2,379 students.

Many of these increases are a result of providing senior secondary grades in communities. Senior secondary school participation by aboriginal students increased from 683 students to 1,193 students, between 1987 and 1991. Young people, some of them with children, are dropping back into school. They increase the demand for school space, senior secondary program facilities and space in schools for child care programs. More students are staying in school and as we meet with more success, additional demands are placed on our capital budget.

Effective training programs that respond to the needs of northern residents and employers are essential. Northerners need education and training programs to be prepared to take advantage of employment opportunities resulting from division and the restructuring of government, as well as opportunities resulting from potential mega-projects such as Izok Lake. Looking at youth, age 15 to 24 in the Northwest Territories, about 50 per cent of them are attending full-time school or post-school programs and about 4,000 youth could benefit form basic adult upgrading. In addition, there are many people who would benefit from upgrading programs coupled with basic life skills training. About 8,000 people receiving social assistance would benefit from this kind of training and support.

More and more people are becoming aware of the critical need for education and training. This is easily demonstrated by the number of students enrolled in Arctic College full and part-time programs. In 1992-93, about 1,360 students were enrolled in full-time programs and 6,900 students in part-time programs.

We recognize the importance of training and we must also recognize that increasing the number and variety of training programs offered places demands on our capital resources, particularly to replace existing college facilities in poor condition and for student housing.

Similarly, as people become aware of the variety of ways in which culture can be supported, there is a growing demand for cultural facilities and support for heritage projects. Community museums and libraries, shared spaces in schools and visitor centres and the need for community supported regional cultural institutes have all become more important to the people of the territories. In addition, many of the land claims groups are also looking to the government for additional cultural support. We have to develop a fair and consistent approach to working with communities and with all claimant groups.

The department has revised its planning process. We recognize that we cannot meet all anticipated needs immediately given the current budget. As a result of series of priorities was established that focuses on meeting critical needs first.

The first priority is given to projects necessary to maintain safety, the second priority is given to projects addressing shortfalls in space based on need. The third priority is for facilities with enough space but with program deficiencies and the last priority category is allocated to buildings which need to be upgraded.

A careful review of our planned capital expenditures demonstrated that some projects, such as the projects in Igloolik, Coral Harbour, Sanikiluaq and Cape Dorset schools needed additional resources because the needs had not been adequately addressed in prior years. Other projects have been created to meet previously unrecognized demands, such as the Fort Good Hope and Pangnirtung schools. The timing has also been shifted in some areas to accommodate the development of joint use facilities, such as the libraries in Coral Harbour and Pond Inlet, while other shifts are being proposed to maximize longer term local employment opportunities and minimizing disruption to ongoing programs. As a result, some projects which had been planned in the last funding priority category, projects addressing space upgrades, are being proposed to be reduced or delayed, such as the Fort Simpson school.

We are trying to address our needs for infrastructure on a fair and equitable basis.

We are using population projections and consulting with communities in the development and finalization of our capital plan. Recognizing that capital planning is an ongoing process, we have continued to consult with boards and communities and have listened to the recommendations of the Standing Committee on Finance. As a result, we have made changes to the capital plan to accommodate needs expressed in the Kitikmeot, South Slave and Dogrib regions. For instance, in the South Slave, the board placed a high priority on renovations at J.B. Tyrrell school in Fort Smith, which will now be moved ahead, while renovations to PW Kaeser High School will be delayed.

Likewise, in the Kitikmeot region, renovation work for the schools in Cambridge Bay and Coppermine will be advanced while the additions to the schools in Pelly Bay and Taloyoak will be delayed. In response to the concerns expressed by the Dogrib, necessary and appropriate project funding will be provided to address long-term needs for Chief Jimmy Bruneau School in Edzo.

We want to provide a uniform level of infrastructure throughout the entire territories in response to need. We have developed -- and this has been made available to Members -- four new heritage policies which should address the concerns identified by the standing committee last year. Mr. Chairman, one of our proposed objectives in the main estimates for 1993, is to review and revise our capital standards and criteria.

We are looking at ways to use space effectively, such as the joint use of facilities. We are also exploring ways to cut costs, such as purchasing renovated equipment for Arctic College programs from departments like transportation, and working in partnership with businesses and other agencies to manage and deliver capital projects. The department also supports the training of construction workers through capital resources.

Despite our best efforts, we likely will not be able to meet the expectations of people of the Northwest Territories who are just beginning to realize the impact of financial restraint and who recognize the value and importance of education, training and cultural facilities.

It is clear that we are going to have to develop better ways of consulting and more effective and efficient ways of using our funds. However, we also have to recognize that resources are extremely limited for projects required by new directions and the development of the system in areas such as senior secondary education and child care facilities in schools.

It is becoming extremely difficult to develop a capital plan, given our resources and the demands. The proposed capital estimates for the Department of Education, Culture and Employment strive to balance the need for capital programs with available resources. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Committee Motion 40-12(4): To Delete Rankin Inlet From Keewatin Region, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 308

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you, Mr. Nerysoo. Does the Finance committee have a prepared presentation? Mr. Dent.

Standing Committee On Finance Comments

Committee Motion 40-12(4): To Delete Rankin Inlet From Keewatin Region, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 308

Charles Dent

Charles Dent Yellowknife Frame Lake

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The Standing Committee on Finance response starts off with the capital planning for school projects.

Capital Planning For School Projects

School populations are soaring and with today's tough economic times students are returning to school as never before. This was the message the committee received from the Minister of Education, Culture and Employment. Just maintaining the existing investment in schools (approximately $450 million) requires massive infusions of capital. Implementing high school grade extensions in the communities requires both the addition of classrooms and a redesign of school facilities.

The department informed the committee that they have responded to these challenges with a new approach to capital planning. There are two aspects of this new approach. The first is that school enrolments will be projected using statistical information about the population of communities. In the past, school enrolments were forecast using school statistics, specifically, the number of students enrolled in kindergarten through grade 12.

The second aspect of the new approach to planning has to do with the standards and criteria used for the planning and design of school buildings. The standards and criteria deal with issues such as the number of square feet per student, the number of square feet per classroom, and ultimately, the size of facilities in the communities. The standards also respond to changes in teaching methods and technology, as they affect facility requirements. The department informed the committee that they anticipate having new criteria and standards drafted by December, 1993.

Committee Members noted a larger number of changes to the capital plan over that reported last year. The capital budget increased 28.2 per cent to $38.2 million, in 1994-95. This overall increase is the net result of projected spending reductions of $10 million and $17 million of expenditures for new projects. The committee has examined each of these projects and their potential impact on communities. In some cases, the committee is recommending changes to the department's plan.

One issue that is particularly troublesome to the committee is the recent appearance of school additions for four communities, Fort Liard, Hall Beach, Arctic Bay and Arviat. In all four cases, the additions are required for schools recently built. The difficulty is related to the method used in planning the schools, specifically, the methods used to forecast school enrolments. The department's new approach to planning was notably absent in these cases.

The committee noted that many new school and school addition construction projects were moved ahead or fast tracked in the capital plan. These include the communities of Trout Lake, Fort Good Hope, Fort Norman, Norman Wells, Arctic Bay, Cape Dorset, Igloolik, Pangnirtung, Coral Harbour, Pelly Bay and Taloyoak. The justification for fast tracking these projects includes: existing overcrowding; the need for grade extensions; program deficiencies; or necessary upgrades to the physical plant.

On the other hand, several school projects were set back to later years in the capital plan. These include projects in Jean Marie River, Fort Providence, Fort Simpson, Fort Smith, Lac La Martre, Aklavik, Fort McPherson, Inuvik and Pond Inlet. The committee also noted cases where overcrowding and other deficiencies are creating the need for immediate attention. An example of such a situation is the school in Chesterfield Inlet which is experiencing extreme overcrowding.

During the review of the 1993-94 capital estimates, the committee recommended that the department live up to prior commitments and fast track the renovations to JB Tyrrell Elementary School in Fort Smith by advancing $100,000 for design and tender document production to 1993-94 and construction to 1994-95 and 1995-96. When the standing committee reviewed the capital forecasts received from the Financial Management Board, Members discovered that the renovations for JB Tyrrell Elementary School had been moved even further back, to begin in the fiscal year 1997-98. The Minister, when appearing before the committee, agreed to review this situation. Following this review and the incorporation of information recently received from the community, the funding for this project was reinstated.

The committee had been informed, prior to its review, that the department had deferred the building of a new school in Jean Marie River. The fact that a new school is urgently required in this community was raised when the Minister appeared before the committee. The Minister said that the problem with this project was that the facility is over-designed for the community and construction costs are estimated to be more than what was approved. The Minister stated that the department would like construction to start on this project next summer, at the very latest. He said that materials could be delivered during the winter.

Previously planned expenditures in excess of $10 million were cut from the five year plan. Members were very concerned about the magnitude of this change in plans. The committee does not expect to see such massive readjustments in future capital plans. Members accept that a number of factors have, in combination, made dramatic adjustments necessary in this year. These factors include: forced growth; previously unrecognized demands; grade extensions and other policy changes.

Members also recognize that the department has created a new capital planner position and is implementing new procedures to guide the capital planning process. However, the committee believes that a recommendation is required to ensure that the department conducts effective, fair and comprehensive capital planning for schools.

Committee Motion 41-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 10, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 308

Charles Dent

Charles Dent Yellowknife Frame Lake

Therefore, Mr. Chairman, I move that this committee recommends that the Department of Education, Culture and Employment develop and implement a capital planning strategy which identifies and accounts for factors which affect the size and configuration of school facilities. The committee further recommends that this capital planning strategy be in place in time to guide the development of capital forecasts, including five year plans, beginning with the fiscal year 1995-96. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Committee Motion 41-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 10, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 309

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you, Mr. Dent. The motion is in order. To the motion.

Committee Motion 41-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 10, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 309

An Hon. Member

Question.

Committee Motion 41-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 10, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 309

The Chair John Ningark

Question has been called. All those in favour? All those opposed? Motion is carried.

---Carried

Mr. Dent.

Committee Motion 41-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 10, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 309

Charles Dent

Charles Dent Yellowknife Frame Lake

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Further, the committee is concerned that the capital forecasts, now being considered, are based on standards and criteria that are flawed and outdated.

Committee Motion 42-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 11, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 309

Charles Dent

Charles Dent Yellowknife Frame Lake

Therefore, I move, Mr. Chairman, that this committee recommend that the Department of Education, Culture and Employment reassess major projects which require funding for the current year and make adjustments, where necessary, through the capital outlook process. Projects that require adjustments include the following:

(a)Yellowknife School District #1 requires capital planning funds in the order of $150,000. These funds should be used to make an assessment of the overall picture for school facilities in the district over the short, medium and long term. Funding strategies need to be addressed, as well.

(b)A study should be undertaken to determine the feasibility of combining two school projects in Fort Simpson. The two projects are: the construction of a new elementary school; and renovations to Thomas Simpson School.

(c)Planning funds are required for Chesterfield Inlet. Overcrowding and other deficiencies need to be addressed in the context of short, medium and long-term plans.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Committee Motion 42-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 11, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 310

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you, Mr. Dent. The motion is in order. To the motion. Mr. Gargan.

Committee Motion 42-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 11, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 310

Samuel Gargan Deh Cho

Mr. Chairman, I was informed by the Minister that most of the decisions made at the regional level are determined by the divisional boards of education. It was based on that position that I have been, for some years now, lobbying divisional boards. Are we also, at the same time, allowing the Standing Committee on Finance to determine what is best for the communities?

Committee Motion 42-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 11, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 310

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you, Mr. Gargan. Mr. Dent.

Committee Motion 42-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 11, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 310

Charles Dent

Charles Dent Yellowknife Frame Lake

Mr. Chairman, this motion is in response to the situations where it appears that, in the first two cases, the boards are not being listened to by the department. For instance, the Chairman of the Standing Committee on Finance advised the committee that what the board was told in Fort Simpson was that it was a take it or leave it situation and that, "This is what you were going to get so you might as well jump on board and say this is what you want." After he had discussions with the divisional board following that, he felt that they would be quite interested in reassessing the feasibility of combining the two school projects in Fort Simpson if they thought that there was some possibility that could be looked at.

In the situation with Yellowknife School District #1, in the five year plan, more than $10 million was cut from the five year plan to deal with Yellowknife from this year over last year. Those cuts weren't all in line with what the local school boards would recommend should take place. We are not trying to usurp the responsibilities of the divisional, public or separate boards. We are talking about instances where we saw problems with what had happened in the process.

Committee Motion 42-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 11, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 310

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you, Mr. Dent. To the motion. Mr. Gargan.

Committee Motion 42-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 11, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 310

Samuel Gargan Deh Cho

The motions are reflective of the directions that the regional divisional boards want to go.

Committee Motion 42-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 11, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 310

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you, Mr. Gargan. Mr. Dent, is the motion reflective of the committee's mandate and what the regional divisional boards want? Mr. Dent.

Committee Motion 42-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 11, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 310

Charles Dent

Charles Dent Yellowknife Frame Lake

Mr. Chairman, we were advised that it would reflect the wishes of the boards.

Committee Motion 42-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 11, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 310

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. To the motion. Mr. Gargan.

Committee Motion 42-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 11, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 310

Samuel Gargan Deh Cho

Mr. Chairman, when did the Standing Committee on Finance have these boards appear?

Committee Motion 42-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 11, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 310

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. Mr. Dent.

Committee Motion 42-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 11, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 310

Charles Dent

Charles Dent Yellowknife Frame Lake

Mr. Chairman, the boards did not appear as witnesses. I contacted Yellowknife Education District No. 1 and asked them what they felt was necessary for planning requirements. The chairman of the committee, Mr. Antoine, is the person who advised the committee on the situation in Fort

Simpson. Mr. Arvaluk advised the committee on the situation in Chesterfield Inlet.

Committee Motion 42-12(4): To Adopt Recommendation 11, Carried
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 310

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. To the motion. Mr. Gargan.