Mr. Chairman, the intent of the motion is to not allow us to proceed with buying a piece of equipment, specifically a camera that this particular staff person needs. He is no longer a trainee. He has gone through a training program for three years and is now employed by this government under Renewable Resources to run this audio-visual unit. He is charged with making productions on things like water conservation, fur management harvesting and those good things that all of us enjoy seeing.

What we are saying is this individual, in order to maximize his skills and productivity for the government, needs a camera. The camera costs $15,000. I mean a monitor, I am sorry. We need this equipment to fully utilize his skills. If we don't get it, then it means we continue doing what we have been doing without this equipment. We think it is going to cost the government more. I don't argue with the intent of the motion, if I understand the motion. Perhaps the suggestion might be to withdraw the motion and suggest the whole audio-visual unit within Renewable Resources be reviewed, instead of taking specific items and denying this unit those things they believe they need. I think that would be much more comprehensive and agreeable to the government and certainly to the committee.