Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I can tell the Minister that the Strength at Two Levels report, which I think the government does give some currency to, studied the issue, and that may be the most recent study, and recommended that it is the integrated division of parks and tourism which should be transferred to Renewable Resources. Since parks and tourism are obviously linked, if the tourism division is not being proposed to be transferred to Renewable Resources, does the Minister agree, in light of this close linkage between parks and tourism, that new resources will be required in the Department of Renewable Resources which are not there now, to develop products, to promote and market the parks and to train outfitters and the like. Have these additional staff requirements been developed and calculated? Thank you.
Dennis Patterson on Question 567-12(3): Transfer Of Parks Division To Renewable Resources
In the Legislative Assembly on March 23rd, 1993. See this statement in context.
Supplementary To Question 567-12(3): Transfer Of Parks Division To Renewable Resources
Question 567-12(3): Transfer Of Parks Division To Renewable Resources
Item 5: Oral Questions
March 22nd, 1993
Page 1099
Dennis Patterson Iqaluit
See context to find out what was said next.