Mr. Speaker, I cannot determine what my needs are going to be over the course of the next year. She is asking me to make a commitment not to do something when I have no intentions of making such a suggestion in the first place. It is kind of an awkward question. As I have said, I have no intention of spending capital money to make the secure facility in Fort Smith, to take the physical characteristics and change them so that it could be then seen, at least visually, as an open custody facility. It is still a secure facility. It will stay a secure facility. We have also designated it as a facility which can be used for open custody. That is the point I think the Member is missing. Because of that, the question becomes irrelevant.
Stephen Kakfwi on Question 609-12(3): Consultation With Fort Smith Groups Re River Ridge Facility
In the Legislative Assembly on March 26th, 1993. See this statement in context.
Further Return To Question 609-12(3): Consultation With Fort Smith Groups Re River Ridge Facility
Question 609-12(3): Consultation With Fort Smith Groups Re River Ridge Facility
Item 5: Oral Questions
March 25th, 1993
Page 1216
See context to find out what was said next.