Thank you, Mr. Chairman. It is my understanding that this DL-10 was an alternative experiment to calcium on the highways that was a success in some areas and did not work as well in other areas. It is my understanding there is going to be a continuation of the experiment this year to see how effective it is. If there are particular areas that we did not do as well in, then we could perhaps review and take another look at whether we should continue with this experiment. It was an experimental alternative to calcium. I do not know if that answers the question, but we certainly would try to improve the highways. We intend to continue with more experiments with DL-10, an alternative to calcium. Hopefully, if there were problems that Mr. Antoine is alluding to, I am sure they were brought to our attention. We would be in a position this summer and spring to make sure that it does not happen again.
John Todd on Bill 17: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1993-94
In the Legislative Assembly on March 9th, 1993. See this statement in context.
Bill 17: Appropriation Act, No. 2, 1993-94
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
March 8th, 1993
Page 830
John Todd Keewatin Central
See context to find out what was said next.