The press release tried to relate the kind of revenues, the $4.2 billion the federal government gets from, I believe, a gasoline tax and tried to relate it as to whether it goes back into transportation as an argument that it is putting back an insufficient amount of money from the revenues it generates. The actual revenues generated in the western Arctic...I don't know the actual numbers off the top of my head, but it's marginal with respect to the $4.2 billion.

The one thing we do have in this national highway system is the only gravel highway that is recognized as a national highway. That's why we're in, if you want, the negotiations. As I said, I believe the Department of Transportation can, with some creativity, reassign some of its dollars, if we can find some 50 cent dollars, from the federal government similar to what we did with the strategic transportation initiative that enabled us to bring a number of airport upgrades forward, et cetera. That's where we're heading with this. The taxation issue was used as an argument to illustrate the degree of payback, if you want, with respect to the revenues that are associated through the gas tax. Thank you.