Madam Speaker, perhaps the response was not as well worded as it could have been. That is often the case. The point I was trying to make is that we design programs and are trying to deliver services according to our best judgment, through the good advice of Members of this House. There are evaluation components tied to all of these different programs and services. It is just that there is no community element to the evaluations at this time. We are a government faced with dwindling financial resources and increasing demands placed on us by communities.

It is our judgement that we now have to place existing programs and the resources allocated to them in front of communities and, through the development of the community wellness strategy, get the advice of these people on how we can better allocate and make use of existing resources. It is now time to put all the little programs we have in front of these communities and ask them, in their judgement, if we are making the best use of existing resources under the present arrangements.

My expectation is that they will come up with some suggestions and, at the end of the day, we will see what Mr. Antoine is suggesting, that a strategy will deliver to communities some flexibility so that each community can have the say they want to have to determine where the existing resources are best allocated. That is one of the major elements in the plan to develop a strategy. So, the best I can say is, yes, there is an evaluation component tied to the program. It is done in-house by the government and through questions in this Legislature. But, at the end of the day, we need communities to have input and help us do the ultimate evaluation. That is the strategy that we're developing right now. Thank you.