Thank you, Madam Speaker. I think the Minister got right to the point. I think it was on an assumption. There was never any indication by the city that this should be reclassified from one to four. It was with the advisement of the city that this was designated as class one to correspond to yet another cooperative in that neighbourhood. Condos are fairly new to the territories, so there may be some confusion. The decision was never made in conjunction with anyone, but the department. The department admitted this in a letter that was sent to the members of the cooperative. I would like to know, now that the error has been discovered and brought to their attention, is there any provisions for redress to an error that was caused by the department? Are there any provisions for rectifying this problem?
Tony Whitford on Question 195-12(5): Classification Of Inukshuk Housing Cooperative
In the Legislative Assembly on February 24th, 1994. See this statement in context.
Supplementary To Question 195-12(5): Classification Of Inukshuk Housing Cooperative
Question 195-12(5): Classification Of Inukshuk Housing Cooperative
Item 5: Oral Questions
February 23rd, 1994
Page 345
See context to find out what was said next.