Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I agree with a lot of the changes that are happening, and they are timely, I guess, if two years is timely, but at least it is happening.

I have some concerns and some questions as to what the overall impact of this bill will be on an actual harvester or hunter and trapper. The issue on the definition in the act of principally engaged is still there. It hasn't changed, but I note in the notes the Minister made that the change there will be in the interpretation and will be in the policy. I guess that is the interpretation, but whenever there is an interpretation, there is still an individual who has to make an interpretation, and I assume these are the adjudicators or the officers who deal with claims. So I was a little intrigued by the Minister's comments that there will be a more liberal interpretation of the principally engaged concept. So can the Minister again elaborate a bit on what that means. For a harvester, what does that mean?