A slight clarification on the same clause, 9, 58-9, subsection 11 and 12, where it says, if a sheriff wants to secure a private dwelling, the sheriff has authority from the Supreme Court to break open a door and clause 12 says, "a person so doing will ensure that the building is properly secured." Am I reading that verbatim? Does that mean what it says, that a sheriff can break open a door of a private house and secure it somehow if they say they rescind or neglect to pay their mortgage and the bank wants to take their house?
Fred Koe on Bill 7: Personal Property Security Act
In the Legislative Assembly on March 2nd, 1994. See this statement in context.
Bill 7: Personal Property Security Act
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
March 1st, 1994
Page 484
Fred Koe Inuvik
See context to find out what was said next.