Madam Speaker, I believe that is one detail that really hasn't been taken into consideration or even really been discussed that much. At this point in time, according to the Abbott report, the Power Corporation is to stay intact. It already has all its employees who are situated in various communities.

In the Yukon, because Alberta Power is a very large institution -- I would say it is so large, you can call it an institution -- they really didn't have any need to build up some of the higher technical engineering capabilities that we have in Hay River. They would just import them from their more senior companies. Any area of expertise would just be drawn from a very large firm and brought into the Yukon.

At this point in time, we have the people who we require for planning. It is maybe not a large component, but for the day to day operations. What should be understood as well, is that in the Yukon, it is mainly a hydro energy corporation. There are very few communities on diesel. They have an ability, in a better way than we do, to have lower-cost power generation.

I know from discussions that Yukon Energy has to a certain degree, like the Northwest Territories Power Corporation, improved the level of service since the transfer. They have also invested quite a significant amount of dollars to improve the plants and also to install some new upgraded equipment. But, unlike the Northwest Territories Power Corporation -- and this relates to how a company operates -- the investment and new capital plan has been difficult for them because the cash flow and working capital has been depleted by using funds for other purposes. At this point in time, it's not anticipated that the employees or the work would be sub-contracted and neither, at this time, with the Abbot Report, would there be the flexibility to use the Power Corporation's profits within an energy corporation for purposes other than power generation. Thank you.