Not so much general comments, but a question that has been raised in committee, and I'm not sure we ever did receive a...Or, I didn't hear a satisfactory response and I'll ask it again. It's regarding the clause where you have the two-year limitation. The question is why was the two-year limitation put into this bill? Why not three years, why not one and a half or why not five years? Why was two years chosen?
Fred Koe on Bill 5: An Act To Amend The Maintenance Act
In the Legislative Assembly on February 16th, 1995. See this statement in context.
Bill 5: An Act To Amend The Maintenance Act
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
February 15th, 1995
Page 136
Fred Koe Inuvik
See context to find out what was said next.