Mr. Speaker, it was our initial view that there could be a basis to challenge the legislation because it seems to fly in the face of what was ruled by the Supreme Court in the Sparrow case. Basically what was said there was whatever laws or regulations are made by governments to regulate the aboriginal people's right to pursue their traditional lifestyle, that it should be the least restrictive and least intrusive measures taken if they had to. For instance, in the call for safety. This legislation is proposed legislation. It is not law yet so we have nothing to challenge in a court of law. But if it should become law, then it may very well be that someone, perhaps ourselves or some aboriginal group, would put into the courts a challenge based on the Sparrow case. This is, by our initial review, very, very intrusive. It is unduly intrusive and unduly restrictive on the aboriginal people's right to hunt and to pursue their traditional activities.
That's basically where we're at. We haven't done extensive research into that legal question, but that's the initial opinion that was brought. Thank you.