In the Legislative Assembly on March 2nd, 1995. See this topic in context.

Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 410

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, my question is to the Minister of Renewable Resources. I would like to ask the Minister if he can confirm, on the recent contract awarded to Buffalo Airways for addressing fire suppression this year in the Northwest Territories, whether the contract requirement called for the usage of DC-4s or DC-6s. Thank you.

Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 410

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Minister of Renewable Resources, Mr. Arngna'naaq.

Return To Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 410

Silas Arngna'naaq Kivallivik

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I believe the question would be better answered by the Department of Public Works and Services.

With regard to Renewable Resources, we have indicated to the department which is the appropriate department to hand out the contract, that our requirements for firefighting should be able to meet the needs of the fire situations that we have in the Northwest Territories. To my understanding, we have not given a clear indication as to what type of aircraft will be required in terms of firefighting. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Return To Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 410

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Supplementary, Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Supplementary To Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 411

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to ask the Minister this: is it the responsibility of the department that addresses fire suppression to determine what type of aircraft they require to address fire suppression? Is it not his department's mandate? Thank you.

Supplementary To Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 411

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Mr. Arngna'naaq.

Further Return To Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 411

Silas Arngna'naaq Kivallivik

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Yes, it is the responsibility of the Department of Renewable Resources. However, we gave a minimum standard that is required for firefighting in the Northwest Territories that we would be willing to accept. This was relayed to the Department of Public Works. We showed that DC-4s, which are at the present time being proposed to be used for the summer, will be sufficient and will be able to carry out the firefighting in the Northwest Territories this coming summer. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Further Return To Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 411

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Supplementary, Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Supplementary To Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 411

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I guess the Minister has now answered the first question I had posed to him.

Mr. Speaker, on Tuesday I tabled a document in this House; an evaluation of the appropriateness of the current fire suppression methodology, study 8. The department has expended an excessive amount of money to get this study, I think to the tune of just about $225,000. In this study, section 8 is on DC-4s versus DC-8s. There is a list of disadvantages of using DC-4s over DC-6s. Mr. Speaker, I would like to ask why the Minister has allowed his department not to adhere to the study recommendations that his department commissioned last year. Thank you.

Supplementary To Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 411

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Mr. Arngna'naaq.

Further Return To Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 411

Silas Arngna'naaq Kivallivik

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The study that was conducted by a firm which was contracted to consult with various contractors in the Northwest Territories as well as the people in the Northwest Territories was exactly that, a consultant who would make recommendations to the government, of which the government has the option to take, to use as they so please. This is the way that I, as the Minister of Renewable Resources, took the recommendations. I took them as recommendations, have taken a look at the requirements of firefighting management in Fort Smith. I was advised that it would be acceptable to use DC-4s. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 411

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Thank you. Final supplementary, Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Supplementary To Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 411

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. So the Minister is basically indicating that the recommendations from this consulting firm may be used whenever he determines they should be used, as he has indicated, as the Minister. I would like to ask, after spending just about $225,000 commissioning this report -- and this report basically indicates that the extra cost for using DC-4s would be $500,000 more -- why is he expending public funds on a report which recommended against using DC-4s? Thank you.

Supplementary To Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 411

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Mr. Arngna'naaq.

Further Return To Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

March 1st, 1995

Page 411

Silas Arngna'naaq Kivallivik

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The acceptance of the contracts that were let recently was not necessarily my decision, it was a decision made by Cabinet. So I'm not able to say how that was let. However, I am willing to say that it was advised by the Department of Renewable Resources that a minimum requirement to carry out this contract was to be able to use DC-4s. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Further Return To Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Question 217-12(7): Confirmation Of Aircraft Requirement In Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 411

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Item 6, oral questions. Mr. Patterson.