Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Generally speaking, I would say that everyone would probably agree that if it's possible to deliver the program then we would be able to do it. However, fiscally, we have to deal with the whole issue of priority occupations and I think the one right now that is a serious concern and a priority in Nunavut Arctic College seems to be the trades. We have to focus, at least initially, on that particular matter.

The other thing that we should be cognizant of is the labour market requirements because sometimes we could get into training programs that do not respond to labour market situations. The honourable Member has pointed out one where jobs could be made available, and I'm not going to say that we're not going to respond but I think our experience over the past several years will give us some indication as to how we might be able to do a better job in responding to the Nunavut client. Whether or not it's an issue of creating another program, whether or not it's just simply an access year or whether or not it's a matter of retaining the program here in Yellowknife and, again, doing what we've done in other programs; that is, molded to respond to the needs of the Nunavut communities. That's an issue that needs to be reviewed in the context of our college strategy. The other thing that I pointed out earlier is that we should not lose sight of the potential for creating programs of excellence in each college and, for that matter, in each campus if that's possible. I think there is some expertise that could be better left in one particular location and have people move to those programs. That has to be considered.