Again, Mr. Chairman, just to repeat again, we are committed to doing a review. There are suggestions that the committee has made about changes they would like to see. There is no argument with the suggestions; just that I can't blindly agree to them, no more than the Premier can. We need to do a review that can substantiate very clearly the direction which different departments would like us to take. For instance, the Department of Economic Development and Tourism would be a bit offended, I would say, if I developed a staff position in Ottawa that took on economic issues. That isn't the way we work. We have written to the different departments asking them to give us some input into the type of review we will need. Give us some ideas of what your expectations of the Ottawa office are and your view of the kind of requirements we will need over the next few years. It may be that we all will agree that a very high profile approach to deal with all the issues is the way to go.

However, we all need to articulate to our people why, in this time of fiscal restraint and cutbacks; to beef up the Ottawa office is going to require some rationalization. That is what we are going to look for in the review. We think can start quickly. We have started to work on it already. It should give us the kind of ammunition we need to articulate and support the changes that the committee is looking for. Thank you.