Mr. Chairman, just to follow up on my colleague's comments, Mr. Dent indicated that the Member's charges that fall under this bill are violence against a person, but in the event that a Member partakes in some type of roadblock or protest, etcetera, and there are threats being exchanged without any physical violence being exchanged, is it not correct that with the threats alone, the Member can be charged. Can I get clarification on that?
Jeannie Marie-Jewell on Committee Motion 61-12(7): To Amend Clause 2 Of Bill 32, Defeated
In the Legislative Assembly on June 12th, 1995. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 61-12(7): To Amend Clause 2 Of Bill 32, Defeated
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
June 11th, 1995
Page 1275
Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha
See context to find out what was said next.