That's the dilemma that you have. We've been trying to propose this issue...I'll give you one example: a 45-hour on-the-land program could be five days based on the suggestion you made. On the other hand, it could be eight days if you took it on a five-hour program. If you did it on a four, it could be ten days. That's what we are saying and that's the dilemma you have in the way we are trying to propose it.
I am trying to accommodate the recommendation of the committee by doing it in 126 to be more flexible. That's what I am trying to do.