Yes, so if the sending board, the home board, where the student is starting off receives that funding, wouldn't it make sense to change the act around to say that it would be that board that would be responsible for funding the accommodation, as opposed to the host board? Then there's absolute clarity. Is there a problem with that? Because if there's no problem, then I'll move that amendment and nothing changes, except it's very clear that it's the responsibility of the sending board to provide the accommodation. Of course, they will work out whatever arrangement and the receiving boards can give a list, or whatever.