Yes, the reason I raised the question is that, that is something that I was looking at in regards to the, presently the Bankruptcy Act that is in place in the north is, sort of, obsolete, it is something that, sort of originated from southern Canada, brought to the north in regards to bankruptcies in the north especially this side of the.. traditional activities that people have in regards to the hunting, fishing, trapping. Say there is a
business that is associated around those things that, during the time of bankruptcy, that they are able to retain some of those items to continue operating their traditional skills, such as the guns, the boat maybe, the harness for a dog team or whatever, that they do not lose everything. That there is some traditional aspects put in regards to the act, not looking at it just in the business sense of vehicles and, basically, equipment, but looking at it in the sense of using it to be able to carry on their survival skills in other ways. To be able to hunt and fish and trap by using those materials to do that. So that is why I raised the question, because that I was looking at. I was wondering if that was considered when you looked at this to see how those type of activities in that type of businesses are, sort of, protected?