So, from a philosophical point of view, that is where we are heading. From a practical point of view, as a pragmatic politician it is not conceivable, at least in my mind, that you have two governments, wave a magic wand, in place. There is going to be some staging of the services, and the level of government, et cetera. We have still got to discuss formal financing, et cetera. Many of us have mentioned that, in fact, we are only 28 months away from it. From a practical point of view, I would hope we can do as much as we can to ensure there is a reasonable government up and running. I do not think we will do it all, obviously. Which leads me to the joint sharing of services, whether it is the Kitikmeot boarding home facility, whether it is correctional facilities, whether it is the Stanton Hospital, et cetera, I would think that these arrangements from a practical perspective right now, will probably continue.

However, I qualify it by saying I cannot make any commitment on this issue, because it will be a new government that will be in place. But from a pragmatic point of view, with the last 20 plus years we have used the correctional facilities, for example, in Yellowknife; the Kitikmeot people have used the Stanton hospital -- there may be some changes, I do not know. It would not be politically correct for me to say what a new legislator is going to do. I am just saying as a pragmatic person it would seem to me that it will be phased and perhaps if there is some cost-effective reasons for it or political reasons for it or whatever, that it will probably continue. But that will be up to the two new governments to make bilateral arrangements with each other. I suspect because we are so short of time there will be a requirement for some bilateral arrangements that may be permanent, that may be phased, et cetera in the delivery of services, as Mr. Ootes has suggested. Thank you.