I need clarification, as the chairman of the committee that reviewed this. This wasn't an item. It was in relation to a docking facility in which, because they were still going to be barging fuel from Churchill and other locations last year -- this was also through your capital plan expenditures -- this is just additional work that had to be done on it. That is why it is being flagged here now. All we were talking about was the moorings and also the rate of bringing the pipeline in from the offshore. That is where the large expenditure was. That is just my understanding, as chairman of the committee. This was never associated with the tank farm.
David Krutko on Committee Report 3-13(3): Standing Committee On Resource Management And Development Report On The Review Of The 1996-97 Main Estimates
In the Legislative Assembly on May 16th, 1996. See this statement in context.
Committee Report 3-13(3): Standing Committee On Resource Management And Development Report On The Review Of The 1996-97 Main Estimates
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
May 16th, 1996
Page 460
See context to find out what was said next.