Basically, the direction that you're going is based on the direction of the Social Programs committee, yet the dollars are still within the budget. Have there been any contribution agreements made with the community of Aklavik as to where this stands, or what correspondence has taken place? Are there any agreements in place for this project? This has been in the works for several years and, at this stage, it seems that it's kind of ironic that your predecessor supports the initiative, yet the Social Programs committee gave you direction that they didn't have a problem with the first round but now it seems that it's coming back to the budget and the resources are still there to carry out this project. I find it kind of confusing. Was this a personal decision?
David Krutko on Bill 11: Appropriation Act, 1996-97 Department Of Justice
In the Legislative Assembly on May 22nd, 1996. See this statement in context.
Bill 11: Appropriation Act, 1996-97 Department Of Justice
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
May 21st, 1996
Page 554
See context to find out what was said next.