Before I get into that, I want to say, again, the principle behind this is to have as efficient and small a structure as possible that delivers the programs. To make sure that it is a small, efficient Housing Corporation, or housing arm of the infrastructure of the department as possible. To make sure as much money goes to the communities, whether it is Yellowknife or other places, for houses as possible. For transportation it is for the roads and airports. For public works it is for the buildings, et cetera. That is the purpose of this. As I indicated earlier, we have not dealt with the structure really, but it does not take rocket scientists to figure out that with one infrastructure department, instead of three deputy ministers, you need one, and three finance sections and headquarters would not be needed, only one policy division, one human resources division. That is in headquarters, that is in Yellowknife. I do not have the number here with me, but I think the deputy minister did give an estimate to the Member during one of our presentations.

The other impact would be in the district offices, or in the regional offices, where, instead of three Superintendents, you need one. The finance section, you need one instead of three. The human resources, you need one instead of three. That is where the reductions would be. Headquarters would probably be the most affected. I did not mean to say that it is okay if Yellowknife gets the most cuts, but the important part is the delivery of programs to the clients, to the people in the communities. That is the most important part.