Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I too would say that we vote in favour of the motion. I am disappointed to hear the Minister say that we are taking this out of the poor and giving it to the middle income. He is painting a picture for people out there that is incorrect and irresponsible. I think that to the Ministers of the social envelope, I think we have given direction. We have left it open. They have turned it away as we have heard earlier. Now, we are giving a little more direction to it. I think that if they had reacted sooner as we started this process back in the springtime or early fall, that this would not be at this stage today. I know many people who have moved from their own homes to public housing because it is cheaper to stay in public housing. I have had people, who have their own homes and turned senior, ask me to ask the government to pay their bills because it is being done so in public housing. We are showing an incorrect picture here. I think this would be taken care of quite easily if the work was done soon enough. So, I would suggest to the Members that we do not react to certain words and put down by the ways thing are expressed. The fact is, we suggested a nominal rent to those in public housing because that was there before. We charge people who are disabled in facilities, sometimes up to $700 a month. Yet, we argue the fact that those who do have pensions and that cannot afford small rents. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

-- Applause