No, no. If I said that then it is inaccurate. I have actually said the reverse. There is a requirement for ongoing housing in the smaller communities in some of the centres that may, because of the financing of these units, require some guarantee, either through a lease or through some guarantee that this government will need to provide for its staff, whether it is teachers, butchers, bakers, or candlestick makers. What we are doing here is re-examining our whole leasing policy in an effort to contain the expenditures to the best of our ability, but at the same time, balancing that discussion out with reassuring the developers, banks, and our staff, that housing will be available to them through a lease arrangement. If, as Mr. Voytilla points out, the private sector market is not there.

For example, if you go into a small community like Grise Fiord or Arctic Bay in my colleague, Mr. Barnabas's area, if there is a requirement for housing because the teacher ratio has to change, et cetera, or there is a requirement for new government employees, we will make an arrangement with that community, one way or the other or members within it, whether it is the co-op, the development corporation, or individuals, if they require some form of guarantee or a lease arrangement, we will make that arrangement to secure the housing that is necessary. Now this is the same arrangement that has been advocated by NTI and NIC in their whole drive towards Nunavut, and it is the same arrangement that we have here in the western Arctic with many of the communities, including Tuktoyaktuk in the western Arctic. Thank you.