I do not have the statement in front of me, but my position is clear. Again, I will use the FDL project, if you will allow me, as an example. Where we have a lease arrangement that in the opinion of the government and that cannot be demonstrated there is a requirement for a long-term lease to ensure their mortgages and the long-term money is in place, we will get out of that lease. That is what I meant by that and that is what we are doing. But, where there is a continuing requirement for the government to provide some security to, let us say, a co-operative in, Toonoonik-Sahoonik Co-operative in Pond Inlet, or a development corporation in Arviat, or an individual in Inuvik, we will then provide him, if there is a requirement, if with the security they need to put the mortgages into place, to provide the staff housing that is required for our staff. That is all, nothing else.