I do not have the statement in front of me, but my position is clear. Again, I will use the FDL project, if you will allow me, as an example. Where we have a lease arrangement that in the opinion of the government and that cannot be demonstrated there is a requirement for a long-term lease to ensure their mortgages and the long-term money is in place, we will get out of that lease. That is what I meant by that and that is what we are doing. But, where there is a continuing requirement for the government to provide some security to, let us say, a co-operative in, Toonoonik-Sahoonik Co-operative in Pond Inlet, or a development corporation in Arviat, or an individual in Inuvik, we will then provide him, if there is a requirement, if with the security they need to put the mortgages into place, to provide the staff housing that is required for our staff. That is all, nothing else.
John Todd on Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
In the Legislative Assembly on February 6th, 1997. See this statement in context.
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
February 6th, 1997
Page 461
John Todd Keewatin Central
See context to find out what was said next.