I anticipated that Members would make reference to the conflict of interest issue that was concluded yesterday. For that reason, we have come up with some rulings that address the process that we had yesterday. In Beauchesne's, it states that a Member may not speak again or reflect upon any determination of the House unless intending to conclude with a motion for rescinding it. It is a wholesome restraint upon Members that they cannot revive a debate already concluded, and it would be little use in preventing the same question from being ordered twice in the same session. Without being offered, its merit might be discussed again and again. I would caution the Members. The matter of the conflict of interest issue has been concluded and for anybody that wishes to bring it up. I would have to make a ruling on whether or not it is appropriate to bring it up again. Mrs. Groenewegen.
Mr. Speaker on Member's Statement 239-13(6): Conflict Of Interest Exhibit Signed By Ministers
In the Legislative Assembly on December 8th, 1998. See this statement in context.
Member's Statement 239-13(6): Conflict Of Interest Exhibit Signed By Ministers
Item 3: Members' Statements
December 7th, 1998
Page 587
The Speaker
See context to find out what was said next.