Thank you, Mr. Chairman. One question, depending on the answer. When the original owner came back for extending his lease November 30, 1995, he was told, or the department said, no, we cannot extend the lease because of the situation. Now a year and a half later, July 30, 1997, there is agreement that it can go ahead. During that time it went from a month-to-month lease. My question is, if the original lease ended with an agreement to extend, two options were five-year and five-year, but there is no talk mentioned of a month-to-month. Is this an actual lease extension if, in fact, the options were not exercised when the date of the original lease ended? It is a month-to-month until that time. Can the Minister clarify that for me? Thank you.