Thank you, Mr. Chairman. With regard to Aklavik, because that is one particular case that I have been involved in, I believe your department has been made aware of it. The process was that eventually we went through the municipality where it was distributed under your section of classes, it was classified as a second group that you allocated before you got to group three. Group three will probably be the alcohol centre because it is a non-profit society.

With regard to the outstanding amounts, what I was talking about is there was, apparently, an account that was revolving where they were supposed to eventually pay the different fees. When the building was put on the market for sale, there were operations and maintenance costs for that building because the government was still... it was being taken off as an asset, but there were still costs associated with that building where they had to pay the fuel, the power and whatever. What they did, because the alcohol centre was in that building, was they took those amounts and they charged them back to the alcohol and drug centre for those fees. Why, in this case, could the government not have recouped that cost through the department because it was put on the market and was no longer classified as a government asset? It is a complicated matter but, hopefully, you have received the gist of what I am saying, circumstances which were out of the control of the alcohol centre and out of the control of the government because they classified it as no longer a government asset because it was up for sale. Is there a way that the department can consider looking at recouping those costs which were billed to the alcohol and drug centre?