Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The difficulty that I have with this is that it is a fairly definitive statement that MACA assume a more significant role in the selection of administrative officers. If you get a zealot in the department saying this is a recommendation, this is what is going through. Therefore, every community has to have the input of MACA to select their senior administrative officer, if that officer decides to do so, by this motion. I do not agree with it. I think that it passes on to a community a statement that says the department will participate in the selection of your administrative officer.
Jake Ootes on 47-13(5): Recommendation #4: Committee Report 8-13(5): Infrastructure (re: Maca Audit)
In the Legislative Assembly on June 3rd, 1998. See this statement in context.
47-13(5): Recommendation #4: Committee Report 8-13(5): Infrastructure (re: Maca Audit)
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
June 2nd, 1998
Page 1596
See context to find out what was said next.